WTC7: NIST Acknowledges Freefall (Part II)
WTC7 NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II) Uploaded on YouTube on Feb 12, 2010 by DavidChandler911. The tech brief...
🔥 Related Trending Topics
LIVE TRENDSThis video may be related to current global trending topics. Click any trend to explore more videos about what's hot right now!
THIS VIDEO IS TRENDING!
This video is currently trending in Sweden under the topic 'jennifer aniston'.
About this video
WTC7 NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II)
Uploaded [on YouTube] on Feb 12, 2010 by DavidChandler911
http://youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k
The tech briefing video has been removed from the NIST website.
This is not the "Part II" I had originally envisioned. That will have to wait for Part III. In following up on the erroneous measurement described by John Gross in Part I, I decided to look more carefully at the measurement and find the video frame NIST claims marks the beginning of the collapse. What I found is that there is no motion of the roofline for at least 20-30 video frames after the point identified by John Gross. In other words, the measurement is a complete fabrication with the goal of producing a "measurement" to agree with the result predicted by NIST's collapse model. This result is sufficiently significant to merit its own video.
...More to come soon in Part III.
(For more on John Gross, see youtube.com/watch?v=3SLIzSCt_cg )
-----
[The WTC7 series has elicited a number of questions from people unclear on the details of how I did the measurements, compared to how NIST did them and how the representatives of NIST described their measurements. I have therefore created a WTC7 Measurement FAQ page: 911speakout.org/WTC7-Measurement-FAQ.pdf . I will also use this FAQ as a place of reference for other questions that arise as well.]
------------------
Uploaded [on YouTube] on Feb 12, 2010 by DavidChandler911
http://youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k
The tech briefing video has been removed from the NIST website.
This is not the "Part II" I had originally envisioned. That will have to wait for Part III. In following up on the erroneous measurement described by John Gross in Part I, I decided to look more carefully at the measurement and find the video frame NIST claims marks the beginning of the collapse. What I found is that there is no motion of the roofline for at least 20-30 video frames after the point identified by John Gross. In other words, the measurement is a complete fabrication with the goal of producing a "measurement" to agree with the result predicted by NIST's collapse model. This result is sufficiently significant to merit its own video.
...More to come soon in Part III.
(For more on John Gross, see youtube.com/watch?v=3SLIzSCt_cg )
-----
[The WTC7 series has elicited a number of questions from people unclear on the details of how I did the measurements, compared to how NIST did them and how the representatives of NIST described their measurements. I have therefore created a WTC7 Measurement FAQ page: 911speakout.org/WTC7-Measurement-FAQ.pdf . I will also use this FAQ as a place of reference for other questions that arise as well.]
------------------
Video Information
Views
3
Total views since publication
Duration
5:40
Video length
Published
May 15, 2013
Release date