Why You Should Ignore Roko's Basilisk – The Dangerous Thought Experiment 🚫

Discover why Roko's Basilisk is a misleading and harmful idea. Watch this video to understand the risks and why you shouldn't take it seriously. Learn more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WSSZ05iutw

Adam Eubanks85.6K views3:39

🔥 Related Trending Topics

LIVE TRENDS

This video may be related to current global trending topics. Click any trend to explore more videos about what's hot right now!

THIS VIDEO IS TRENDING!

This video is currently trending in Saudi Arabia under the topic 'new zealand national cricket team vs west indies cricket team match scorecard'.

About this video

Please do not take anything in this video too seriously. Why you shouldn't care about Roko's Basilisk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WSSZ05iutw Roko’s basilisk is a thought experiment proposed in 2010 by the user Roko on the Less Wrong community blog. Roko used ideas in decision theory to argue that a sufficiently powerful AI agent would have an incentive to torture anyone who imagined the agent but didn't work to bring the agent into existence. The argument was called a "basilisk" because merely hearing the argument would supposedly put you at risk of torture from this hypothetical agent — a basilisk in this context is any information that harms or endangers the people who hear it. Roko's argument was broadly rejected on Less Wrong, with commenters objecting that an agent like the one Roko was describing would have no real reason to follow through on its threat: once the agent already exists, it can't affect the probability of its existence, so torturing people for their past decisions would be a waste of resources. Although several decision theories allow one to follow through on acausal threats and promises — via the same precommitment methods that permit mutual cooperation in prisoner's dilemmas — it is not clear that such theories can be blackmailed. If they can be blackmailed, this additionally requires a large amount of shared information and trust between the agents, which does not appear to exist in the case of Roko's basilisk. Less Wrong's founder, Eliezer Yudkowsky, banned discussion of Roko's basilisk on the blog for several years as part of a general site policy against spreading potential information hazards. This had the opposite of its intended effect: a number of outside websites began sharing information about Roko's basilisk, as the ban attracted attention to this taboo topic. Websites like RationalWiki spread the assumption that Roko's basilisk had been banned because Less Wrong users accepted the argument; thus many criticisms of Less Wrong cite Roko's basilisk as evidence that the site's users have unconventional and wrong-headed beliefs. Get 60 Free Days of Unlimited Access to Scribd! https://www.scribd.com/g/6lchwh Follow Me: Twitter: https://twitter.com/khanradcoder Instagram: https://instagram.com/thekhanradcoder/ GitHub: https://github.com/KhanradCoder

Video Information

Views
85.6K

Total views since publication

Likes
6.8K

User likes and reactions

Duration
3:39

Video length

Published
Nov 6, 2019

Release date

Quality
hd

Video definition