Scott Aaronson - The Ghost in the Quantum Turing Machine

Scott discusses whether quantum computers could have subjective experience, whether information is physical and what might be important for consciousness - h...

Science, Technology & the Future‱8.0K views‱21:21

đŸ”„ Related Trending Topics

LIVE TRENDS

This video may be related to current global trending topics. Click any trend to explore more videos about what's hot right now!

THIS VIDEO IS TRENDING!

This video is currently trending in Bangladesh under the topic 's'.

About this video

Scott discusses whether quantum computers could have subjective experience, whether information is physical and what might be important for consciousness - he touches on classic philosophical conundrums and the observation that while people want to be thorough-going materialists, unlike traditional computers brain-states are not obviously copyable. Aaronson wrote about this his paper 'The Ghost in the Quantum Turing Machine' (found here https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0159 ). Scott also critiques Tononi's integrated information theory (IIT). Questions include: - In “Could a Quantum Computer Have Subjective Experience?” you speculate that a process has to ‘fully participate in the arrow of time’ to be conscious, and this points to decoherence. If pressed, how might you try to formalize this? - In “Is ‘information is physical’ contentful?” you note that if a system crosses the Schwarzschild bound it collapses into a black hole. Do you think this could be used to put an upper bound on the ‘amount’ of consciousness in any given physical system? - One of your core objections to IIT is that it produces blatantly counter-intuitive results. But to what degree should we expect intuition to be a guide for phenomenological experience in evolutionarily novel contexts? I.e., Eric Schwitzgebel notes "Common sense is incoherent in matters of metaphysics. There’s no way to develop an ambitious, broad-ranging, self- consistent metaphysical system without doing serious violence to common sense somewhere. It's just impossible. Since common sense is an inconsistent system, you can’t respect it all. Every metaphysician will have to violate it somewhere." Many thanks to Mike Johnson for providing these questions! Bio : Scott Aaronson is a theoretical computer scientist and David J. Bruton Jr. Centennial Professor of Computer Science at the University of Texas at Austin. His primary areas of research are quantum computing and computational complexity theory. He blogs at Shtetl-Optimized: https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/ #quantumcomputing #quantumcomputers #consciousness #philosophyofmind Many thanks for watching! Consider supporting SciFuture by: a) Subscribing to the SciFuture YouTube channel: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=TheRationalFuture b) Donating - Bitcoin: 1BxusYmpynJsH4i8681aBuw9ZTxbKoUi22 - Etherium: 0xd46a6e88c4fe179d04464caf42626d0c9cab1c6b - Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scifuture c) Sharing the media SciFuture creates: http://scifuture.org Kind regards, Adam Ford - Science, Technology & the Future

Video Information

Views
8.0K

Total views since publication

Likes
205

User likes and reactions

Duration
21:21

Video length

Published
Jan 15, 2019

Release date

Quality
hd

Video definition

Captions
Available

Subtitles enabled

Tags and Topics

This video is tagged with the following topics. Click any tag to explore more related content and discover similar videos:

Tags help categorize content and make it easier to find related videos. Browse our collection to discover more content in these categories.