Fisher vs Neyman-Pearson: Key Differences πŸ”

Explore the functional differences between Fisher's significance tests and Neyman-Pearson's acceptance tests in scientific methodology.

Fisher vs Neyman-Pearson: Key Differences πŸ”
Kualiti Noliqh
895 views β€’ Jun 29, 2015
Fisher vs Neyman-Pearson: Key Differences πŸ”

About this video

(Based on http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00341)

DID YOU KNOW that Fisher's tests of significance and Neyman-Pearson's tests of acceptance are easily confused because of their conceptual similarity?

The historical confusion between both testing approaches may be partly due to the similar concepts they use, even when such concepts actually refer to different functionality. This presentation browses over the conceptual similarities, the functional differences, and the proposal for a reconceptualization which is fitter to function and clearly separates both theories. [Download the printable presentation at http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1508.9761]

Want to know more?
- Perezgonzalez, J.D. (2014). A reconceptualization of significance testing. Theory & Psychology, 24(6), 852-859. doi:10.1177/0959354314546157
- Kualiti Noliqh channel, Better Science playlist. YouTube.com/playlist?list=PLmMbItdI7w-NzKE27V0qb6DGXqEYHJWnP

Tags and Topics

Browse our collection to discover more content in these categories.

Video Information

Views

895

Likes

9

Duration

15:01

Published

Jun 29, 2015

Related Trending Topics

LIVE TRENDS

Related trending topics. Click any trend to explore more videos.