Fisher vs Neyman-Pearson: Key Differences 🔍

(Based on http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00341)

DID YOU KNOW that Fisher's tests of significance and Neyman-Pearson's tests of acceptance are easily confused because of their conceptual similarity?

The historical confusion between both testing approaches may be partly due to the similar concepts they use, even when such concepts actually refer to different functionality. This presentation browses over the conceptual similarities, the functional differences, and the proposal for a reconceptualization which is fitter to function and clearly separates both theories. [Download the printable presentation at http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1508.9761]

Want to know more?
- Perezgonzalez, J.D. (2014). A reconceptualization of significance testing. Theory & Psychology, 24(6), 852-859. doi:10.1177/0959354314546157
- Kualiti Noliqh channel, Better Science playlist. YouTube.com/playlist?list=PLmMbItdI7w-NzKE27V0qb6DGXqEYHJWnP